Ga naar inhoud
[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

How we can recognize,Is er sprake van een houdstermaatschappij in de zin van artikel 20, lid 4 en 6 Vpb zoals dat artikel luidde op 31 december 2018?

Featured Replies

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Hans van den Bergh

  • Moderator

Can you elaborate on your question? A bit more context would be welcome to be able to help you.

Succes & Groet, 

Hans (J.H.) van den Bergh, MSc BEc I Innovatiestrategieën Ontwerper I HL-Deelnemer en -Moderator I Gediplomeerd Specialist Arbeidsrecht I Bedrijfsidee? Toets het Grátis: HIERMEE!

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

  • Auteur

Dear Hans,Thanks for your comment.

If a financial  holding  B.V has 100 percent share of a working B.V but in  a fiscal year didn't make any payments to working B.V and the holding activity stopped for example because of Covid limitation.

 

This financial holding company when want to fill out corporate income  tax  return in holding activities and the like section how to have answer this question?

 

Is er sprake van een houdstermaatschappij in de zin van artikel 20, lid 4 en 6 Vpb zoals dat artikel luidde op 31 december 2018?

 

yes or no?

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Joost Rietveld

  • Moderator

Did you mean to say that the management activities ended? In which case you can answer no to the question about the art. 20 of this was only temporarily.

 

Because if the holding activities have ended, that would mean that the holding BV has sold the shares in the working BV. I guess the latter isn't the case...

Fiscaal en juridisch advies en expertise bij bedrijfsoverdrachten en rechtsvormkeuze of -wijziging: DenariusAdvies

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

  • Auteur

Dear Joost,Thanks for your answer.

The  holding  still has management activity and 100 percent shares of B.V just in a determined financial year there was no any payment or support from financial holding to Working  in fact the activities of working also was so limit because of covid limitation.

 

I assume with your above explanation I have to answer yes to question because the  financial holding still has management activities.  Is it right?

 

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Joost Rietveld

  • Moderator

It's the other way around. Article 20 describes a holding company with no other activities other then owning shares in one or more subsidiaries.

 

Since in this particular year your holding performed no management duties due to vivid circumstances, you can answer the question with no.

 

Yes it's the answer if just holding activities are a permanent in thing

Fiscaal en juridisch advies en expertise bij bedrijfsoverdrachten en rechtsvormkeuze of -wijziging: DenariusAdvies

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

  • Auteur

Thanks then we will answer no.

There 's another matter, the participation has not been  incorporated in a fiscal unity with the taxpayer in this financial year also Net benefits from the participation is negative  but when  i put the negative amount in Nettovoordelen uit de deelneming  of deelnemingen section in   corporate income tax return  in the Overview of taxable profit section ,participation exemption is Same negative amount and taxable profit is the same positive amount, it calculate this amount as benefit and ask the tax on it.

I don't know waht's a matter ?what's my mistake?

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Joost Rietveld

  • Moderator

Hi Maria

 

if the result  from the daughter company is negative, then it is not tax deductible for the parent company. The "deelnemingsvrijstelling" (usually) only applies for positive results from the daughter company.

 

 

Fiscaal en juridisch advies en expertise bij bedrijfsoverdrachten en rechtsvormkeuze of -wijziging: DenariusAdvies

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

  • Auteur

Hi Joost,

 

your meaning is,  shouldn't i put any amount in  Nettovoordelen uit de deelneming  of deelnemingen section as  the result  from the daughter company is negative?  

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

  • Auteur

I put negative amount but in the final calculation on system ,it calculated as benefit  with taxable amount  also holdings and it's  daughter company didn't incorporated in a fiscal unity and each one will send separate tax declaration . I can't understand why system calculate it as benefit.

 

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Joost Rietveld

  • Moderator
3 uur geleden, Maria.k zei:

shouldn't i put any amount in  Nettovoordelen uit de deelneming  of deelnemingen section as  the result  from the daughter company is negative

No, you should

Fiscaal en juridisch advies en expertise bij bedrijfsoverdrachten en rechtsvormkeuze of -wijziging: DenariusAdvies

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Joost Rietveld

  • Moderator
3 uur geleden, Maria.k zei:

calculated as benefit  with taxable amount

That's correct, providing you have deducted the same amount in the P&L under results from subsidiaries (resultaat uit deelnemingen)

Fiscaal en juridisch advies en expertise bij bedrijfsoverdrachten en rechtsvormkeuze of -wijziging: DenariusAdvies

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

  • Auteur

Thanks Joost,

 

In which section , can I deduct this  amount ?Fiscal profit or increase an decrease section?

 

could you please clarify which item?

 

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Joost Rietveld

  • Moderator

In the P&L, Winst en verliesrekening in Dutch

Fiscaal en juridisch advies en expertise bij bedrijfsoverdrachten en rechtsvormkeuze of -wijziging: DenariusAdvies

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Maria.k

  • Auteur

Thanks, when i Put this negative amount in P&L,I get this warning in fiscal winst page 

 

Het totaalbedrag bij Saldo fiscale winstberekening (€ ...) is niet gelijk aan het bedrag bij Winstberekening volgens Winst-en-verliesrekening (€ -...).
Controleer de bedragen die u eerder in de aangifte hebt ingevuld.

 

The holding and it's daughter company didn't incorporated in a fiscal unity and each one will send separate tax declaration therefore the loss of daughter isn't in holding balance sheet.

 

I assume it cause the difference between amount in fiscal winst

[[Template forums/front/topics/postHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]
Geplaatst:

Joost Rietveld

  • Moderator

That could have numerous causes, from here I can't help to figure this out for you

Fiscaal en juridisch advies en expertise bij bedrijfsoverdrachten en rechtsvormkeuze of -wijziging: DenariusAdvies

Gast
Dit topic is nu gesloten voor nieuwe reacties.

Maak een account aan of log in om te reageren

Je moet een lid zijn om een reactie te kunnen achterlaten

Account aanmaken

Registreer voor een nieuwe account in onze community. Het is erg gemakkelijk!

Registreer een nieuw account

Inloggen

Heb je reeds een account? Log hier in.

Nu inloggen

Cookies op HigherLevel.nl

We hebben cookies geplaatst op je toestel om deze website voor jou beter te kunnen maken. Je kunt de cookie instellingen aanpassen, anders gaan we er van uit dat het goed is om verder te gaan.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.
[[Template core/global/global/includeJS is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]